Fir Flooding Response = Confusing

My rhizotron flooding experiment with Nordmann and Fraser firs has been interesting, but so far it has provided more questions than answers. On the side I carried out a small flooding recovery experiment, testing to see if there were differences between the fir species in root regeneration after a period of flooding. I expected Nordmann fir to be better at regenerating roots than Fraser fir.

I tested a one week flooding event and a two week flooding event. Today marked three weeks since the one week flooding event ceased. The last two weeks there were differences between species, but as of today they have equaled out. This really surprised me. What?!?!

A root scan showing light-colored growing root tips on a Nordmann fir three weeks after a one week flooding event. Recovery is underway.

Not to be outdone, this Fraser fir is also recovering.

The plants that were flooded for two weeks are now showing indications of new root tip formation. This was not what I expected to see.

I’m left trying to explain why the foliage of Nordmann firs looks so much better than that of Fraser firs in flooded conditions. If the roots are responding the same, why are the shoots so different?


Leave a comment

Filed under Horticulture

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s